 | | RECENT STATE DECISIONS |
February 2003
|
To read this entire item of approximately 745 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Texas Court of Appeals Denies Nuisance Claim Based Entirely on Apprehension of Future Harm
Union Pacific Resources Company v. Cooper,
The Court of Appeals of Texas has held that a landowner may not, as a matter of law, proceed on a claim of nuisance where the plaintiff and his property had not actually been harmed, even though plaintiff has fear or apprehension that the defendants' activities might, in the future, expose the plaintiff to toxic substances.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Litigation) Nuisance
Texas) All State
Court of Appeals - Houston
Texas Railroad Commission
Union Pacific Resources Company v. Cooper
|