 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
October 2002
|
To read this entire item of approximately 900 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Court of Appeals: In an Issue of First Impression, the Ninth Circuit Holds that Mussel Harvesting Byproducts Are Not "Pollutants" under the Clean Water Act
Association to Protect Hammersley, Eld, and Totten Inlets v. Taylor Resources,Inc.,
On August 6,2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s summary judgment ruling holding that biological byproducts from mussel harvesting are not subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act (CWA).
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
 Statutes - Federal) Clean Water Act) Animal Byproducts
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Animal Byproducts
Washington) Puget Sound
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Washington State Department of Ecology
Association to Protect Hammersley, Eld and Totten Inlets v. Taylor Resources, Inc.
|
