 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
June 2002
|
To read this entire item of approximately 1200 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
United States Supreme Court Upholds Temporary Development Moratorium in Lake Tahoe Area against Takings Challenge
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
The United States Supreme Court recently held that two successive development moratoria totaling 32 months do not automatically constitute a taking of property requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This decision represents a decisive victory to local planning agencies, who may now continue to utilize reasonable development moratoria as land use planning tools, without having to compensate property owners.
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Land Use) Takings
California) Lake Tahoe
Nevada) Lake Tahoe
United States Supreme Court
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planing Agency
|