 | | RECENT FEDERAL DECISIONS |
June 2002
|
To read this entire item of approximately 750 words online now in PDF format:
Click here to read this item if you are an existing subscriber to this publication.
Click here to purchase the full text of this item to read now (price: $25).
To subscribe to this publication and immediately access all its archives including this item, select the relevant publication under 'Catalogue' in the left-hand column
PLEASE NOTE: to read PDFs on www.argento.com you must be using Version 5 of Acrobat Reader or Adobe Reader. If you have an earlier version you can download the latest free of charge by clicking here
|
Defendants Escape with Sanctions Sought because of Their Alleged Failure to Comply with Discovery Orders
Kara Holding Corp. v. Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc.
In a soil and groundwater contamination case, a United States District Court denied plaintiff Kara Holding Corporation's (KHC) motion to strike the answer of defendants that was filed after defendants and their lawyers allegedly failed to comply with discovery orders misrepresented facts to the court. While the motion seeking terminating sanctions was denied, the court stated that "[a]ny future failure to comply may result in the type of harsh sanctions that plaintiff sought prematurely in this motion."
The information contained on this page is presented for your convenience as news and analysis. It is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Please consult an attorney for advice in your case or matter
|
Read related items on:
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Attorneys Fees
Topics) Pollution and Contamination) Groundwater
Topics) Water Quality) Pollution
New York) All State
Southern District of New York
Kara Holding Corp. v. Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc.
|